Triple
T561329
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit |
E13456
|
entity |
| Predicate | authorizedJudgeships |
P16419
|
FINISHED |
| Object | 16 |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: 16 | Statement: [United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, authorizedJudgeships, 16]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: authorizedJudgeships Context triple: [United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, authorizedJudgeships, 16]
-
A.
hasJudiciary
Indicates that an entity possesses, is served by, or is under the authority of a judicial body or legal court system.
-
B.
judgeAppointmentBy
Indicates that one entity is appointed to the role of judging or evaluating another entity by a specific authority or process.
-
C.
awardingJurisdiction
Indicates the authority or legal power granted to an entity to make decisions, judgments, or awards in a particular domain or case.
-
D.
hasJudicialSeat
Indicates that an entity holds an official position or seat within a judicial body or court.
-
E.
judicialRole
Indicates that one entity holds or performs a specific official function or position within the judicial system in relation to another entity or legal matter.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a4933edcf08190b35ecfd6014caee6 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 7:27 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a499e2795c8190903240e79964156d |
completed | March 1, 2026, 7:56 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a494befb8481908bb4e2e9f31e343b |
completed | March 1, 2026, 7:34 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69a4985952a481908b918350ececf484 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 7:49 p.m. |
Created at: March 1, 2026, 7:32 p.m.