Triple

T5610008
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Dennis v. United States E147329 entity
Predicate laterTreatment P13185 FINISHED
Object Its approach to subversive advocacy was limited by Brandenburg v. Ohio. E33569 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Its approach to subversive advocacy was limited by Brandenburg v. Ohio. | Statement: [Dennis v. United States, laterTreatment, Its approach to subversive advocacy was limited by Brandenburg v. Ohio.]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07 
Target entity: Its approach to subversive advocacy was limited by Brandenburg v. Ohio.
Context triple: [Dennis v. United States, laterTreatment, Its approach to subversive advocacy was limited by Brandenburg v. Ohio.]
  • A. Brandenburg v. Ohio chosen
    Brandenburg v. Ohio is a 1969 U.S. Supreme Court decision that significantly strengthened free speech protections by establishing the "imminent lawless action" test for when advocacy of violence can be punished under the First Amendment.
  • B. The First Amendment did not bar prosecution of the defendant's antiwar publications under the circumstances of the case.
    The First Amendment did not bar prosecution of the defendant's antiwar publications under the circumstances of the case is the central holding of the 1919 Supreme Court decision Frohwerk v. United States, which upheld convictions for antiwar speech during World War I.
  • C. Ohio Criminal Syndicalism Act
    The Ohio Criminal Syndicalism Act was a state law that criminalized advocacy of violence or unlawful methods of political change, later deemed unconstitutional in the landmark free speech case Brandenburg v. Ohio.
  • D. County of Allegheny v. ACLU
    County of Allegheny v. ACLU is a 1989 U.S. Supreme Court case that refined the interpretation of the Establishment Clause by addressing the constitutionality of religious holiday displays on government property.
  • E. Clark v. Community for Creative Non-Violence
    Clark v. Community for Creative Non-Violence is a 1984 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld restrictions on symbolic protest camping in public parks, clarifying the limits of expressive conduct protections under the First Amendment.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69c0090500f881908374285baf0ac46f completed March 22, 2026, 3:21 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69c0211dfc88819097b6d4254a61f65a completed March 22, 2026, 5:04 p.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69c04d4876208190b8f5b5ab2ba762d8 completed March 22, 2026, 8:12 p.m.
Created at: March 22, 2026, 3:39 p.m.