Triple

T5591570
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Côtes du Rhône E146888 entity
Predicate alsoProducedIn P46755 FINISHED
Object Northern Rhône communes LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Northern Rhône communes | Statement: [Côtes du Rhône, alsoProducedIn, Northern Rhône communes]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: alsoProducedIn
Context triple: [Côtes du Rhône, alsoProducedIn, Northern Rhône communes]
  • A. coProduced
    Indicates that two or more entities jointly produced or created a work, project, or product together.
  • B. associatedProduction chosen
    Indicates that there is a related or connected production (such as a work, performance, or manufacturing process) linked to the subject entity.
  • C. alsoPlayedIn
    Indicates that an entity (such as a person or performer) participated or appeared in another work, production, or context in addition to the one already referenced.
  • D. producedFilm
    Indicates that one entity served as the producer (or production company) responsible for making or financing the creation of a particular film.
  • E. laterProducedIn
    Indicates that one production event or version occurred after another in time.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69c009036c408190981a8d690b679b67 completed March 22, 2026, 3:21 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69c020a3365c8190bd223226c0a6969f completed March 22, 2026, 5:02 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69c01b16b9bc8190ab0b945507d90e05 completed March 22, 2026, 4:38 p.m.
Created at: March 22, 2026, 3:38 p.m.