Triple

T5579028
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Astraeus E146593 entity
Predicate symbolicAspect P64550 FINISHED
Object astral influence LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: astral influence | Statement: [Astraeus, symbolicAspect, astral influence]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: symbolicAspect
Context triple: [Astraeus, symbolicAspect, astral influence]
  • A. refersToAspect
    Indicates that one entity specifically references or points to a particular aspect, feature, or component of another entity.
  • B. coversAspect
    Indicates that one entity addresses, includes, or deals with a particular aspect or facet of another entity or topic.
  • C. governsAspectOf
    Indicates that one entity exercises control, regulation, or determining influence over a particular aspect or component of another entity.
  • D. originalAspect
    Indicates that one entity represents the initial or primary form, version, or facet from which another related entity is derived or viewed as a variation.
  • E. symbolicContinuity
    Indicates that there is a consistent, ongoing use or preservation of the same symbols or symbolic forms across time, contexts, or instances.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69c0090287a08190b4098411effe970c completed March 22, 2026, 3:21 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69c0206bfea08190aa2c8df9f88013ac completed March 22, 2026, 5:01 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69c01b147cc081909237f3f2967d4cb8 completed March 22, 2026, 4:38 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69c01f0684908190ae2d14f0bd2ab892 completed March 22, 2026, 4:55 p.m.
Created at: March 22, 2026, 3:37 p.m.