Triple

T5556775
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Lipotidae E145662 entity
Predicate threatsToRepresentativeSpecies P956 FINISHED
Object intensive fishing LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: intensive fishing | Statement: [Lipotidae, threatsToRepresentativeSpecies, intensive fishing]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: threatsToRepresentativeSpecies
Context triple: [Lipotidae, threatsToRepresentativeSpecies, intensive fishing]
  • A. threatenedBy chosen
    Indicates that one entity poses a danger or potential harm to another entity.
  • B. areEndangeredIn
    Indicates that the entities are classified as endangered within a specified geographic area or jurisdiction.
  • C. creationCanBecomeExtinct
    Indicates that something which has been created is capable of ceasing to exist or becoming extinct.
  • D. conservationIssue
    Indicates that an entity is associated with a problem, threat, or concern related to the protection, preservation, or sustainable management of natural resources or biodiversity.
  • E. subjectSpeciesStatus
    Indicates the conservation or biological status assigned to the subject species (e.g., endangered, native, invasive, protected).
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69c008fcaf788190bafa02a1917ee73b completed March 22, 2026, 3:21 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69c01ffe12cc81908186f28ace0f4d82 completed March 22, 2026, 4:59 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69c01b10bbf8819098655839c03b7832 completed March 22, 2026, 4:38 p.m.
Created at: March 22, 2026, 3:36 p.m.