Triple
T5540185
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Sapir–Whorf hypothesis |
E145269
|
entity |
| Predicate | strongVersionClaim |
P64805
|
FINISHED |
| Object | language determines thought |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: language determines thought | Statement: [Sapir–Whorf hypothesis, strongVersionClaim, language determines thought]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: strongVersionClaim Context triple: [Sapir–Whorf hypothesis, strongVersionClaim, language determines thought]
-
A.
strongVersionClaims
Indicates that one version of something asserts or maintains a stronger or more definitive claim than another version.
-
B.
weakVersionClaims
Indicates that one entity asserts a less strict, weaker, or more limited version of a claim made by another entity.
-
C.
supportsClaim
Indicates that one entity provides evidence, reasoning, or backing that strengthens or validates the truth or credibility of another entity’s claim.
-
D.
claimsToBe
Indicates that one entity asserts or declares itself to have a particular identity, role, or property, regardless of whether this assertion is true.
-
E.
mainClaim
Indicates that one statement is presented as the central or primary assertion being made about a topic.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69c008fa64888190adae56c8f9ea4031 |
completed | March 22, 2026, 3:21 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69c01fb487648190948493fe96cec0ff |
completed | March 22, 2026, 4:58 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69c01b0c50e48190a1b03ecd20ca440b |
completed | March 22, 2026, 4:38 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69c01f4032408190a4f0d2eb21ebd870 |
completed | March 22, 2026, 4:56 p.m. |
Created at: March 22, 2026, 3:35 p.m.