Triple
T5540171
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Sapir–Whorf hypothesis |
E145269
|
entity |
| Predicate | instanceOf |
P0
|
FINISHED |
| Object | theory of linguistic relativity |
C1146
|
CONCEPT FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
CD
Concept disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: theory of linguistic relativity Context triple: [Sapir–Whorf hypothesis, instanceOf, theory of linguistic relativity]
-
A.
linguistic theory
chosen
Linguistic theory is the systematic study and modeling of the structure, use, and acquisition of language, aiming to explain how languages are organized, processed, and understood.
-
B.
linguistic phenomenon
A linguistic phenomenon is any observable pattern, behavior, or feature in language use or structure that can be systematically described and analyzed.
-
C.
linguistic tradition
A linguistic tradition is the historically developed and culturally shared system of language practices, norms, and conventions that shape how a community speaks, writes, and interprets meaning over time.
-
D.
theory of Indo-European origins
The theory of Indo-European origins is a set of scholarly models and hypotheses that seek to explain where, when, and how the Proto-Indo-European language and its speakers emerged and dispersed to form the widespread Indo-European language family.
-
E.
linguistic argument
A linguistic argument is a structured set of reasons or evidence expressed through language to support or challenge a particular claim about meaning, usage, or grammatical structure.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69c008fa64888190adae56c8f9ea4031 |
completed | March 22, 2026, 3:21 p.m. |
Created at: March 22, 2026, 3:35 p.m.