Triple

T553025
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject 5 train E11881 entity
Predicate compatibleWithSignaling P16280 FINISHED
Object IRT signaling standards LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: IRT signaling standards | Statement: [5 train, compatibleWithSignaling, IRT signaling standards]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: compatibleWithSignaling
Context triple: [5 train, compatibleWithSignaling, IRT signaling standards]
  • A. hasSign
    Indicates that an entity possesses, displays, or is associated with a particular sign or symbol.
  • B. coSignedWith
    Indicates that an entity has jointly signed a document, agreement, or obligation together with another entity.
  • C. hasSignFor
    Indicates that one entity displays, bears, or provides a sign, symbol, or notice that represents, directs attention to, or gives information about another entity.
  • D. backwardCompatibleWith
    Indicates that one entity can correctly interpret, use, or function with data, interfaces, or behavior designed for an earlier version of another entity.
  • E. signedTogetherWith
    Indicates that one entity signed a document, agreement, or contract jointly with another entity.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a4932941d08190815efd422f0b4ca7 completed March 1, 2026, 7:27 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69a4991b296481908cf27e1d1ec67052 completed March 1, 2026, 7:52 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69a494bc1f8c8190904356f3a8e801de completed March 1, 2026, 7:34 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69a4985952a481908b918350ececf484 completed March 1, 2026, 7:49 p.m.
Created at: March 1, 2026, 7:32 p.m.