Triple
T552706
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Fakenham |
E11874
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasMarketCharterSince |
P16265
|
FINISHED |
| Object | 13th century |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: 13th century | Statement: [Fakenham, hasMarketCharterSince, 13th century]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasMarketCharterSince Context triple: [Fakenham, hasMarketCharterSince, 13th century]
-
A.
hasMarket
Indicates that an entity possesses, operates in, or is associated with a particular market or marketplace.
-
B.
hasMarketMakers
Indicates that an entity is associated with one or more market makers who provide liquidity or facilitate trading for it.
-
C.
hasMarketParticipants
Indicates that a market or trading venue involves or is associated with specific participating entities (such as buyers, sellers, or intermediaries).
-
D.
hasTradingDays
Indicates that an entity is associated with specific days on which trading or commercial transactions are conducted.
-
E.
hasMajorMarket
Indicates that an entity has a primary or most significant market in a specified location or segment.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a4932941d08190815efd422f0b4ca7 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 7:27 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a4991b296481908cf27e1d1ec67052 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 7:52 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a494bc1f8c8190904356f3a8e801de |
completed | March 1, 2026, 7:34 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69a4985952a481908b918350ececf484 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 7:49 p.m. |
Created at: March 1, 2026, 7:32 p.m.