Triple
T5522556
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Foraker Act |
E144844
|
entity |
| Predicate | subjectOf |
P38
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Insular Cases (U.S. Supreme Court jurisprudence context) |
E417275
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Insular Cases (U.S. Supreme Court jurisprudence context) | Statement: [Foraker Act, subjectOf, Insular Cases (U.S. Supreme Court jurisprudence context)]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Insular Cases (U.S. Supreme Court jurisprudence context) Context triple: [Foraker Act, subjectOf, Insular Cases (U.S. Supreme Court jurisprudence context)]
-
A.
Insular Cases
chosen
The Insular Cases are a series of early 20th-century U.S. Supreme Court decisions that defined the constitutional status and rights of residents in American overseas territories.
-
B.
insular cases doctrine
The insular cases doctrine is a body of early 20th-century U.S. Supreme Court decisions holding that full constitutional rights do not automatically extend to all territories under American control, creating a distinction between incorporated and unincorporated territories.
-
C.
Gibbons v. Ogden
Gibbons v. Ogden was an 1824 U.S. Supreme Court case that broadly affirmed federal power over interstate commerce, significantly strengthening national authority relative to the states.
-
D.
Martin v. Hunter's Lessee
Martin v. Hunter's Lessee is an 1816 U.S. Supreme Court case that established the Court's authority to review state court decisions on federal law, reinforcing federal judicial supremacy.
-
E.
Slaughter-House Cases
The Slaughter-House Cases were an 1873 U.S. Supreme Court decision that narrowly interpreted the Fourteenth Amendment’s Privileges or Immunities Clause, significantly limiting its protection of civil rights against state infringement.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69c008f873a481909b4d9f7e2db3c37d |
completed | March 22, 2026, 3:21 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69c01f73cc8c8190a92a839c1ca804c7 |
completed | March 22, 2026, 4:57 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69c027f2e98c8190880752c9ae8aba4f |
completed | March 22, 2026, 5:33 p.m. |
Created at: March 22, 2026, 3:34 p.m.