Triple
T5499708
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Battle of Barnet |
E144294
|
entity |
| Predicate | tacticalConsequence |
P15636
|
FINISHED |
| Object | friendly fire among Lancastrian troops |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: friendly fire among Lancastrian troops | Statement: [Battle of Barnet, tacticalConsequence, friendly fire among Lancastrian troops]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: tacticalConsequence Context triple: [Battle of Barnet, tacticalConsequence, friendly fire among Lancastrian troops]
-
A.
tacticalOutcome
chosen
Indicates the specific result or consequence produced by a particular tactic or tactical action in a given situation.
-
B.
militaryConsequence
Indicates a causal relationship where one event, action, or condition leads to a specific outcome or effect in the military domain (such as changes in capability, strategy, or conflict status).
-
C.
hasConsequence
Indicates that one event, action, or condition leads to or results in another as its outcome or effect.
-
D.
tactic
Indicates a strategic method or maneuver employed by one entity to influence, counter, or gain advantage over another in a specific context.
-
E.
territorialConsequence
Indicates the resulting change or effect on territorial control, boundaries, or status that follows from a particular event, action, or condition.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69c008f5a2748190bce7a39aabf87a6d |
completed | March 22, 2026, 3:21 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69c01f08c2a4819093e772a1497c7ecc |
completed | March 22, 2026, 4:55 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69c01b052f3c81909f71c6add0f35a6f |
completed | March 22, 2026, 4:38 p.m. |
Created at: March 22, 2026, 3:32 p.m.