Triple
T5488663
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Parthian language |
E123646
|
entity |
| Predicate | instanceOf |
P0
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Middle Iranian language |
C7624
|
CONCEPT FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
CD
Concept disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: Middle Iranian language Context triple: [Parthian language, instanceOf, Middle Iranian language]
-
A.
Northwest Iranian language
A Northwest Iranian language is a member of the western branch of the Iranian languages spoken primarily in regions of northwestern Iran and neighboring areas, characterized by shared phonological, lexical, and grammatical features distinct from Southwest Iranian languages.
-
B.
branch of Iranian languages
chosen
A branch of Iranian languages is a subgroup within the Iranian language family comprising closely related languages that share a common historical origin, structural features, and geographic distribution.
-
C.
Elamite language
Elamite language is an extinct language isolate once spoken in the ancient kingdom of Elam in what is now southwestern Iran, known primarily from cuneiform inscriptions dating from the 3rd to 1st millennia BCE.
-
D.
Anatolian language
An Anatolian language is any member of an extinct branch of the Indo-European language family once spoken in ancient Anatolia (modern-day Turkey), including languages such as Hittite, Luwian, and Lycian.
-
E.
West Slavic languages
West Slavic languages are a subgroup of the Slavic language family, including Polish, Czech, Slovak, and related languages, primarily spoken in Central Europe and characterized by shared phonological, grammatical, and lexical features.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69bd464a2d908190869324ce176779c8 |
completed | March 20, 2026, 1:06 p.m. |
Created at: March 20, 2026, 2:10 p.m.