Triple
T5479114
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | IKEv2 |
E123427
|
entity |
| Predicate | instanceOf |
P0
|
FINISHED |
| Object | security association protocol |
C995
|
CONCEPT FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
CD
Concept disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: security association protocol Context triple: [IKEv2, instanceOf, security association protocol]
-
A.
cryptographic protocol
A cryptographic protocol is a precisely defined sequence of operations and message exchanges that uses cryptographic primitives to achieve security goals such as confidentiality, integrity, authentication, and non-repudiation between parties.
-
B.
cryptographic protocol framework
A cryptographic protocol framework is a structured set of tools, abstractions, and rules that enables the design, specification, analysis, and implementation of secure communication protocols.
-
C.
network security protocol
chosen
A network security protocol is a defined set of rules and procedures that protect data integrity, confidentiality, and authenticity during communication between devices over a network.
-
D.
asymmetric cryptographic algorithm
An asymmetric cryptographic algorithm is a method that uses a mathematically related pair of keys—one public and one private—to enable secure operations such as encryption, decryption, and digital signatures without sharing secret keys.
-
E.
security
Security is the conceptual class that encompasses mechanisms, policies, and practices designed to protect assets, information, and individuals from threats, vulnerabilities, and unauthorized access.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69bd4648883481909e9775d43300c5fa |
completed | March 20, 2026, 1:06 p.m. |
Created at: March 20, 2026, 2:09 p.m.