Triple

T5478370
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Terry v. Ohio E123410 entity
Predicate legalStandardEstablished P18491 FINISHED
Object reasonable suspicion LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: reasonable suspicion | Statement: [Terry v. Ohio, legalStandardEstablished, reasonable suspicion]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: legalStandardEstablished
Context triple: [Terry v. Ohio, legalStandardEstablished, reasonable suspicion]
  • A. legalStandardCreated chosen
    Indicates that one entity (such as a case, statute, or regulation) establishes or formulates a legal standard that is then applied or referenced by another entity.
  • B. legalStandardType
    Indicates the specific type or category of legal standard that governs or applies to a given legal rule, decision, or evaluation.
  • C. legalStandardHistoricallyAssociatedWith
    Indicates that a particular legal standard has been historically linked or traditionally associated with another legal concept, practice, or context.
  • D. regulatoryStandard
    Indicates that one entity serves as an official rule, guideline, or benchmark that governs, constrains, or evaluates the behavior, quality, or performance of another entity.
  • E. legalRequirement
    Indicates that one entity is obligated by law to perform, provide, or comply with something in relation to another entity or situation.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69bd4648883481909e9775d43300c5fa completed March 20, 2026, 1:06 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69bd9247a16c8190ac5a02534da48853 completed March 20, 2026, 6:30 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69bd91a58c448190904964a439045e05 completed March 20, 2026, 6:27 p.m.
Created at: March 20, 2026, 2:09 p.m.