Triple

T5461509
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Heer Ranjha E122603 entity
Predicate importanceIn P1887 FINISHED
Object Punjabi literature LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Punjabi literature | Statement: [Heer Ranjha, importanceIn, Punjabi literature]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: importanceIn
Context triple: [Heer Ranjha, importanceIn, Punjabi literature]
  • A. isImportantFor chosen
    Indicates that something holds significant value, relevance, or necessity in relation to something else.
  • B. importantSaint
    Indicates that the subject is recognized as a particularly significant or highly revered saint within a religious or spiritual tradition.
  • C. politicalImportance
    Indicates the degree to which something holds significance, influence, or priority within political processes, decisions, or power structures.
  • D. significance
    Indicates that one entity holds particular importance, influence, or meaningful impact in relation to another entity or context.
  • E. lostImportanceUnder
    Indicates that one entity’s importance or prominence decreased when another specified entity came into power, control, or influence.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69bd4643f16081908d7f29e08096115a completed March 20, 2026, 1:06 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69bd927c946c8190aef40679199fede3 completed March 20, 2026, 6:31 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69bd91a370a88190b5d17b8a5387138d completed March 20, 2026, 6:27 p.m.
Created at: March 20, 2026, 2:08 p.m.