Triple
T5460290
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Saka languages |
E122578
|
entity |
| Predicate | instanceOf |
P0
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Eastern Iranian languages |
C7624
|
CONCEPT FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
CD
Concept disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: Eastern Iranian languages Context triple: [Saka languages, instanceOf, Eastern Iranian languages]
-
A.
Northwest Iranian language
A Northwest Iranian language is a member of the western branch of the Iranian languages spoken primarily in regions of northwestern Iran and neighboring areas, characterized by shared phonological, lexical, and grammatical features distinct from Southwest Iranian languages.
-
B.
branch of Iranian languages
chosen
A branch of Iranian languages is a subgroup within the Iranian language family comprising closely related languages that share a common historical origin, structural features, and geographic distribution.
-
C.
Northeast Caucasian language
A Northeast Caucasian language is a member of a diverse family of languages spoken primarily in the northeastern Caucasus region, characterized by complex consonant systems and rich case morphology.
-
D.
Elamite language
Elamite language is an extinct language isolate once spoken in the ancient kingdom of Elam in what is now southwestern Iran, known primarily from cuneiform inscriptions dating from the 3rd to 1st millennia BCE.
-
E.
Eastern Romance language
An Eastern Romance language is a member of the Romance branch of the Indo-European language family that evolved from Eastern varieties of Vulgar Latin, primarily spoken in the Balkans and surrounding regions.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69bd46424248819085282ddf50a565f3 |
completed | March 20, 2026, 1:06 p.m. |
Created at: March 20, 2026, 2:08 p.m.