Triple

T5425807
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Picard iteration E121358 entity
Predicate proofRole P63687 FINISHED
Object constructive proof of Picard–Lindelöf theorem LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: constructive proof of Picard–Lindelöf theorem | Statement: [Picard iteration, proofRole, constructive proof of Picard–Lindelöf theorem]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: proofRole
Context triple: [Picard iteration, proofRole, constructive proof of Picard–Lindelöf theorem]
  • A. signatureRole
    Indicates the specific function or capacity in which an entity participates in a signing or signature-related action.
  • B. effectiveRole
    Indicates the functional role or capacity an entity actually performs or holds in a given context, regardless of its formal or nominal designation.
  • C. possibleRole
    Indicates that an entity is capable of or eligible to serve in a particular role or function in a given context.
  • D. secretRole
    Indicates that an entity holds a role or function that is intentionally hidden or not publicly disclosed within a given context.
  • E. encodingRole
    Indicates the role or function an entity has in the process of encoding information into a particular form or representation.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69bd463b58d88190b258261573de9e91 completed March 20, 2026, 1:06 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69bd8911a7348190ad9378a248190f07 completed March 20, 2026, 5:51 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69bd846b8bdc81909dcdc2a3084226f2 completed March 20, 2026, 5:31 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69bd8910de688190aa0cd80627849a60 completed March 20, 2026, 5:51 p.m.
Created at: March 20, 2026, 2:06 p.m.