Triple

T5425646
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject E(n) E121355 entity
Predicate isIsometryGroupOf P14251 FINISHED
Object R^n LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: R^n | Statement: [E(n), isIsometryGroupOf, R^n]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: isIsometryGroupOf
Context triple: [E(n), isIsometryGroupOf, R^n]
  • A. hasIsometryGroup chosen
    Indicates that one entity possesses or is associated with a particular isometry group describing all distance-preserving transformations of that entity.
  • B. usesSymmetryGroup
    Indicates that one entity employs or is based on a particular symmetry group in its structure, behavior, or formulation.
  • C. hasSymmetryGroupOrder
    Indicates that an entity possesses a symmetry group whose total number of distinct symmetry operations equals the given order.
  • D. isMaximallySymmetric
    Indicates that the subject exhibits the highest possible degree of symmetry allowed by the relevant structure, constraints, or context.
  • E. isIsomorphicTo
    Indicates that two structures have a one-to-one, structure-preserving correspondence between their elements, making them equivalent in form even if not identical in content.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69bd463b58d88190b258261573de9e91 completed March 20, 2026, 1:06 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69bd8911a7348190ad9378a248190f07 completed March 20, 2026, 5:51 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69bd846b8bdc81909dcdc2a3084226f2 completed March 20, 2026, 5:31 p.m.
Created at: March 20, 2026, 2:06 p.m.