Triple
T5425472
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Sperner's lemma |
E121351
|
entity |
| Predicate | isConstructive |
P63672
|
FINISHED |
| Object | yes |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: yes | Statement: [Sperner's lemma, isConstructive, yes]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: isConstructive Context triple: [Sperner's lemma, isConstructive, yes]
-
A.
nonConstructive
Indicates that the relationship or action does not provide a direct, explicit method or example to realize or build the object, outcome, or proof it asserts exists.
-
B.
hasConstruction
Indicates that one entity possesses, contains, or is characterized by a particular construction, structure, or built form associated with it.
-
C.
canBeConstructedWith
Indicates that one entity can be formed, built, or assembled using another entity as material, components, or means.
-
D.
criticizedConstruct
Indicates that one entity expressed disapproval or negative judgment about another entity’s constructed work, idea, or creation.
-
E.
createdByConstructionOf
Indicates that something comes into existence as a result of a construction process or building activity performed by an agent.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69bd463b58d88190b258261573de9e91 |
completed | March 20, 2026, 1:06 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69bd8911a7348190ad9378a248190f07 |
completed | March 20, 2026, 5:51 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69bd846b8bdc81909dcdc2a3084226f2 |
completed | March 20, 2026, 5:31 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69bd8910de688190aa0cd80627849a60 |
completed | March 20, 2026, 5:51 p.m. |
Created at: March 20, 2026, 2:06 p.m.