Triple
T5423315
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Think BIG |
E121301
|
entity |
| Predicate | marketsThrough |
P63582
|
FINISHED |
| Object | music culture branding |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: music culture branding | Statement: [Think BIG, marketsThrough, music culture branding]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: marketsThrough Context triple: [Think BIG, marketsThrough, music culture branding]
-
A.
marketsIn
Indicates that one entity promotes, sells, or offers another entity’s products or services within a particular market or geographic area.
-
B.
coreMarket
Indicates that an entity serves as the primary or most important market for another entity’s products, services, or activities.
-
C.
marketForm
Indicates the type or structure of the market in which an entity operates or a transaction occurs.
-
D.
marketContext
Indicates the broader economic, competitive, and situational conditions under which a product, service, or transaction is positioned or evaluated.
-
E.
relatedMarket
Indicates that two markets are connected or associated, such that activity, conditions, or changes in one market are relevant to or influence the other.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69bd463b58d88190b258261573de9e91 |
completed | March 20, 2026, 1:06 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69bd8812f84c819094d8516f69fff83d |
completed | March 20, 2026, 5:46 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69bd8469f5e48190bbe5c8bdfe8925ea |
completed | March 20, 2026, 5:31 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69bd8741e8588190863fd5cfb559136d |
completed | March 20, 2026, 5:43 p.m. |
Created at: March 20, 2026, 2:06 p.m.