Triple
T5423140
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Golden Age of hip hop |
E121297
|
entity |
| Predicate | typicalProductionTechnique |
P14965
|
FINISHED |
| Object | heavy use of funk samples |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: heavy use of funk samples | Statement: [Golden Age of hip hop, typicalProductionTechnique, heavy use of funk samples]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: typicalProductionTechnique Context triple: [Golden Age of hip hop, typicalProductionTechnique, heavy use of funk samples]
-
A.
typicalProductionType
Indicates the usual or characteristic type of production activity associated with an entity.
-
B.
hasProductionMethod
Indicates that one entity is produced, created, or manufactured using the method, process, or technique specified by another entity.
-
C.
partOfProduction
Indicates that one entity functions as a component, segment, or phase within the overall process or structure of another production.
-
D.
artisticTechnique
chosen
Indicates the method, style, or process used to create or execute an artistic work.
-
E.
mainGenerationTechnology
Indicates the primary technology or method used to generate something, typically identifying the dominant production or generation approach among possible alternatives.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69bd463b58d88190b258261573de9e91 |
completed | March 20, 2026, 1:06 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69bd8812f84c819094d8516f69fff83d |
completed | March 20, 2026, 5:46 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69bd8469f5e48190bbe5c8bdfe8925ea |
completed | March 20, 2026, 5:31 p.m. |
Created at: March 20, 2026, 2:06 p.m.