Triple
T5422859
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Аҧсуа бызшәа |
E121292
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasDialect |
P4251
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Bzyb dialect |
E129310
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Bzyb dialect | Statement: [Аҧсуа бызшәа, hasDialect, Bzyb dialect]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Bzyb dialect Context triple: [Аҧсуа бызшәа, hasDialect, Bzyb dialect]
-
A.
Bzyb dialect
chosen
The Bzyb dialect is a regional variety of the Abkhaz language traditionally spoken in the Bzyb River area of Abkhazia.
-
B.
Abzhywa dialect
The Abzhywa dialect is a major regional variety of the Abkhaz language, traditionally spoken in the Abzhywa (Abzhua) area of Abkhazia.
-
C.
Doabi dialect
The Doabi dialect is a regional variety of Punjabi traditionally spoken in the Doaba region of the Indian state of Punjab, between the Beas and Sutlej rivers.
-
D.
Bashgal dialect
The Bashgal dialect is a regional variety of the Kamviri language spoken by Nuristani communities in the Bashgal (Peche) Valley of eastern Afghanistan.
-
E.
Nabua dialect
The Nabua dialect is a local variety of the Rinconada Bikol language spoken primarily in and around the municipality of Nabua in Camarines Sur, Philippines.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69bd463b58d88190b258261573de9e91 |
completed | March 20, 2026, 1:06 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69bd8812f84c819094d8516f69fff83d |
completed | March 20, 2026, 5:46 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69bf3ab7f6b481908fead172fbdafe36 |
completed | March 22, 2026, 12:41 a.m. |
Created at: March 20, 2026, 2:06 p.m.