Triple
T5422118
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Angolar Creole |
E121276
|
entity |
| Predicate | alternativeName |
P39
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Língua Angolar |
E437462
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Língua Angolar | Statement: [Angolar Creole, alternativeName, Língua Angolar]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Língua Angolar Context triple: [Angolar Creole, alternativeName, Língua Angolar]
-
A.
Anakalangu language
The Anakalangu language is an Austronesian language spoken by communities on the island of Sumba in eastern Indonesia.
-
B.
Apurinã language
The Apurinã language is an indigenous Arawakan language spoken by the Apurinã people of the Brazilian Amazon, known for its complex verbal morphology and endangered status.
-
C.
Forro language
chosen
Forro language is a Portuguese-based creole spoken primarily on São Tomé Island in São Tomé and Príncipe.
-
D.
Hoanya language
The Hoanya language is an extinct Austronesian language once spoken by the Hoanya people of western Taiwan and classified among the indigenous Formosan languages.
-
E.
Nendö language
The Nendö language is an Oceanic language spoken on Nendö Island in the Solomon Islands’ Temotu Province.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69bd463b58d88190b258261573de9e91 |
completed | March 20, 2026, 1:06 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69bd87ec45c48190a8a25bf582b02440 |
completed | March 20, 2026, 5:46 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69bf3ab7f6b481908fead172fbdafe36 |
completed | March 22, 2026, 12:41 a.m. |
Created at: March 20, 2026, 2:06 p.m.