Triple

T5421489
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Postel’s law E121260 entity
Predicate associatedWith P37 FINISHED
Object RFC 793 E60156 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: RFC 793 | Statement: [Postel’s law, associatedWith, RFC 793]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: RFC 793
Context triple: [Postel’s law, associatedWith, RFC 793]
  • A. RFC 793 chosen
    RFC 793 is the foundational Internet standard that defines the Transmission Control Protocol (TCP), specifying how reliable, ordered, and error-checked data transmission works between hosts on an IP network.
  • B. RFC 791
    RFC 791 is the foundational Internet standard that specifies the design, structure, and operation of the Internet Protocol version 4 (IPv4).
  • C. RFC 792
    RFC 792 is the Internet standard document that specifies the Internet Control Message Protocol (ICMP), which is used for network diagnostics and error reporting in IP networks.
  • D. RFC 1072
    RFC 1072 is an early TCP/IP standards document that introduced experimental TCP extensions for high-performance and long-delay networks.
  • E. RFC 768
    RFC 768 is the Internet standard that defines the User Datagram Protocol (UDP), a core transport-layer protocol used for low-latency, connectionless data transmission.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69bd463b58d88190b258261573de9e91 completed March 20, 2026, 1:06 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69bd87eac41481908a4982db5d119edd completed March 20, 2026, 5:46 p.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69bf3ab7f6b481908fead172fbdafe36 completed March 22, 2026, 12:41 a.m.
Created at: March 20, 2026, 2:06 p.m.