Triple
T5420268
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | St. Clair County, Alabama |
E121229
|
entity |
| Predicate | seatLocatedAt |
P23175
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Ashville, Alabama |
E183771
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Ashville, Alabama | Statement: [St. Clair County, Alabama, seatLocatedAt, Ashville, Alabama]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Ashville, Alabama Context triple: [St. Clair County, Alabama, seatLocatedAt, Ashville, Alabama]
-
A.
Ashville, Alabama
chosen
Ashville, Alabama is a small historic town in central Alabama that serves as one of the two county seats of St. Clair County.
-
B.
Thomasville, Alabama
Thomasville, Alabama is a small city in Clarke County known historically as a regional trade center in southwest Alabama’s Black Belt.
-
C.
Roanoke, Alabama
Roanoke, Alabama is a small city in eastern Alabama known for its rural character and role as a local commercial and community hub.
-
D.
Sylvania, Alabama
Sylvania, Alabama is a small rural town in northeastern Alabama known for its close-knit community and location atop Sand Mountain.
-
E.
Fayetteville, Alabama
Fayetteville, Alabama is an unincorporated rural community located in Shelby County in the central part of the state.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69bd463b58d88190b258261573de9e91 |
completed | March 20, 2026, 1:06 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69bd87e8f1cc81908b997f8a417697c0 |
completed | March 20, 2026, 5:46 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69c1351fb4a88190bb12f3a5f8cd92ac |
completed | March 23, 2026, 12:42 p.m. |
Created at: March 20, 2026, 2:06 p.m.