Triple

T5420256
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject St. Clair County, Alabama E121229 entity
Predicate hasJurisdiction P285 FINISHED
Object Ashville, Alabama E183771 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Ashville, Alabama | Statement: [St. Clair County, Alabama, hasJurisdiction, Ashville, Alabama]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Ashville, Alabama
Context triple: [St. Clair County, Alabama, hasJurisdiction, Ashville, Alabama]
  • A. Ashville, Alabama chosen
    Ashville, Alabama is a small historic town in central Alabama that serves as one of the two county seats of St. Clair County.
  • B. Thomasville, Alabama
    Thomasville, Alabama is a small city in Clarke County known historically as a regional trade center in southwest Alabama’s Black Belt.
  • C. Roanoke, Alabama
    Roanoke, Alabama is a small city in eastern Alabama known for its rural character and role as a local commercial and community hub.
  • D. Sylvania, Alabama
    Sylvania, Alabama is a small rural town in northeastern Alabama known for its close-knit community and location atop Sand Mountain.
  • E. Fayetteville, Alabama
    Fayetteville, Alabama is an unincorporated rural community located in Shelby County in the central part of the state.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69bd463b58d88190b258261573de9e91 completed March 20, 2026, 1:06 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69bd87e8f1cc81908b997f8a417697c0 completed March 20, 2026, 5:46 p.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69c124dc89a88190a219eda67e6d933c completed March 23, 2026, 11:32 a.m.
Created at: March 20, 2026, 2:06 p.m.