Triple
T5419422
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Tsawout First Nation |
E121210
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasTreatyStatus |
P38540
|
FINISHED |
| Object | not under a modern treaty |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: not under a modern treaty | Statement: [Tsawout First Nation, hasTreatyStatus, not under a modern treaty]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasTreatyStatus Context triple: [Tsawout First Nation, hasTreatyStatus, not under a modern treaty]
-
A.
treatyStatus
chosen
Indicates the current legal or diplomatic condition of a treaty between parties, such as whether it is proposed, signed, ratified, active, suspended, or terminated.
-
B.
hasMainTreaty
Indicates that one entity is the primary or principal treaty associated with another entity.
-
C.
recognizedByTreatyParty
Indicates that an entity’s status, rights, or existence is formally acknowledged or accepted by a party to a treaty under the terms of that treaty.
-
D.
hasNoSingleTreaty
Indicates that there is no single, unified treaty governing the relationship between the entities, implying multiple or fragmented agreements instead.
-
E.
treatyConcluded
Indicates that a formal agreement or treaty has been officially finalized and brought into force between the involved parties.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69bd463b58d88190b258261573de9e91 |
completed | March 20, 2026, 1:06 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69bd87e8f1cc81908b997f8a417697c0 |
completed | March 20, 2026, 5:46 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69bd8469f5e48190bbe5c8bdfe8925ea |
completed | March 20, 2026, 5:31 p.m. |
Created at: March 20, 2026, 2:05 p.m.