Triple
T54086
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Domain Name System |
E1065
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasRecordType |
P2554
|
FINISHED |
| Object | A |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: A | Statement: [Domain Name System, hasRecordType, A]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasRecordType Context triple: [Domain Name System, hasRecordType, A]
-
A.
hasMemberType
Indicates that an entity includes or is associated with members belonging to a specified type or category.
-
B.
hasCollectionType
Indicates that an entity is associated with or organized under a specific type or category of collection.
-
C.
hasOperationType
Indicates the specific kind or category of operation associated with an entity or process.
-
D.
hasStructureType
Indicates that an entity possesses or is classified by a specific structural type or configuration.
-
E.
hasTypeOfRecipient
Indicates that an entity is associated with a specific category or kind of recipient it is intended for or directed to.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a248adc5b48190aa8db9fb092fb28a |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:45 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a24b3a9e848190b80de3c858678b3a |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:56 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a24ac52fb08190aa7c38f83434f795 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:54 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69a24b39eef081909cec4333f2b25513 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:56 a.m. |
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 1:50 a.m.