Triple

T5396456
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Fort de Joux E120667 entity
Predicate regionHistory P63734 FINISHED
Object part of Franche-Comté defensive system LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: part of Franche-Comté defensive system | Statement: [Fort de Joux, regionHistory, part of Franche-Comté defensive system]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: regionHistory
Context triple: [Fort de Joux, regionHistory, part of Franche-Comté defensive system]
  • A. historicalRegion
    Indicates that an entity is or was a geographically defined area recognized for its significance during a particular historical period.
  • B. regionHistoricalName
    Indicates that a region has been known by a particular historical name during some past period.
  • C. historicalRegionCode
    Indicates that an entity is associated with a specific code identifying a historical region.
  • D. historicalCoreRegion
    Indicates that a region served as the central or foundational area of a group, state, or civilization during a significant historical period.
  • E. formsHistoricalRegionWith
    Indicates that two or more entities together constitute or are recognized as a single historical region.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69bd4637b92c8190b815b6443ae4b323 completed March 20, 2026, 1:06 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69bd8932b8bc8190bd31e11b167a7212 completed March 20, 2026, 5:51 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69bd84660ea08190a641084814fcf94d completed March 20, 2026, 5:31 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69bd8931302c81908afcb0f011e91f09 completed March 20, 2026, 5:51 p.m.
Created at: March 20, 2026, 2:04 p.m.