Triple
T5394277
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Western India States Agency |
E120610
|
entity |
| Predicate | hadJurisdictionOver |
P808
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Kutch State |
E76150
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Kutch State | Statement: [Western India States Agency, hadJurisdictionOver, Kutch State]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Kutch State Context triple: [Western India States Agency, hadJurisdictionOver, Kutch State]
-
A.
Kutch
chosen
Kutch is a large district in western India known for its salt desert landscapes, rich handicraft traditions, and vibrant cultural festivals.
-
B.
Jhabua State
Jhabua State was a former princely state in western India, located in what is now Madhya Pradesh and historically ruled by Rajput chiefs under British suzerainty.
-
C.
Narsinghgarh State
Narsinghgarh State was a former princely state in central India, historically ruled by local royalty under British suzerainty.
-
D.
Sirohi State
Sirohi State was a princely state in western India, ruled by Rajput chiefs and later integrated into the Indian Union after independence.
-
E.
Dhrol State
Dhrol State was a former princely state in western India historically governed by the Jadeja Rajput dynasty.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69bd4637b92c8190b815b6443ae4b323 |
completed | March 20, 2026, 1:06 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69bd87441a208190b79561614759894b |
completed | March 20, 2026, 5:43 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69bf4879955c8190bc82bef433294f7c |
completed | March 22, 2026, 1:40 a.m. |
Created at: March 20, 2026, 2:04 p.m.