Triple
T5392984
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Håstad’s switching lemma |
E120579
|
entity |
| Predicate | instanceOf |
P0
|
FINISHED |
| Object | result in computational complexity theory |
C7186
|
CONCEPT FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
CD
Concept disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: result in computational complexity theory Context triple: [Håstad’s switching lemma, instanceOf, result in computational complexity theory]
-
A.
foundational principle in theoretical computer science
chosen
A foundational principle in theoretical computer science is a core, abstract concept or rule—such as computability, complexity, or formal language theory—that underlies and unifies the study of algorithms, computation models, and their inherent limits.
-
B.
model of computation
A model of computation is an abstract mathematical framework that defines how algorithms are represented and executed, specifying the rules, operations, and resources available for performing computations.
-
C.
complexity measure
A complexity measure is a quantitative function or criterion used to assess and compare the intricacy, difficulty, or resource requirements of objects, systems, or problems.
-
D.
result in complex analysis
A result in complex analysis is a proven statement or theorem about functions of a complex variable, often revealing deep relationships between analytic, geometric, and topological properties in the complex plane.
-
E.
theoretical computer science conference
A theoretical computer science conference is a formal academic gathering where researchers present, discuss, and critique new results and ideas in areas such as algorithms, complexity theory, cryptography, and formal methods.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69bd4637b92c8190b815b6443ae4b323 |
completed | March 20, 2026, 1:06 p.m. |
Created at: March 20, 2026, 2:04 p.m.