Triple
T5391385
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | The Application of Redemption |
E120336
|
entity |
| Predicate | doctrinalPerspective |
P11302
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Reformed theology |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Reformed theology | Statement: [The Application of Redemption, doctrinalPerspective, Reformed theology]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: doctrinalPerspective Context triple: [The Application of Redemption, doctrinalPerspective, Reformed theology]
-
A.
doctrinalStance
chosen
Indicates the specific set of doctrines, beliefs, or official teachings that an entity adheres to or promotes.
-
B.
doctrinalEmphasis
Indicates a relationship where a doctrine, belief system, or teaching is given particular focus, priority, or stress within a religious, ideological, or organizational context.
-
C.
doctrinalSignificance
Indicates the importance or impact that a doctrine or set of teachings has within a particular religious, legal, or ideological system.
-
D.
doctrinalTheme
Indicates that one entity concerns, expresses, or is characterized by a particular doctrinal or theological theme in relation to another.
-
E.
doctrinalConcern
Indicates a relationship where one party has a worry, objection, or issue specifically about the correctness or acceptability of another party’s doctrines or teachings.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69bd46354c648190a38b26f107010a96 |
completed | March 20, 2026, 1:05 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69bd87185f788190bd5244a1f7dbb5c8 |
completed | March 20, 2026, 5:42 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69bd8463a9c88190bd760378f3026180 |
completed | March 20, 2026, 5:31 p.m. |
Created at: March 20, 2026, 2:04 p.m.