Triple

T5387094
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Western Romance E120226 entity
Predicate hasSyntacticTrait P7162 FINISHED
Object increased use of prepositions LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: increased use of prepositions | Statement: [Western Romance, hasSyntacticTrait, increased use of prepositions]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasSyntacticTrait
Context triple: [Western Romance, hasSyntacticTrait, increased use of prepositions]
  • A. syntacticType
    Indicates the grammatical or structural category that characterizes how an expression functions within a syntactic construction.
  • B. hasLinguisticFeature chosen
    Indicates that an entity possesses a particular linguistic property, trait, or characteristic.
  • C. hasSyllabicStructure
    Indicates that an entity possesses a specific arrangement or pattern of syllables, such as their number, order, or type.
  • D. hasSyllableStructure
    Indicates that an entity (typically a word or morpheme) possesses a particular arrangement or pattern of syllables.
  • E. hasVerbalFeature
    Indicates that an entity possesses a specific verbal property, characteristic, or behavior related to speech or language.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69bd46354c648190a38b26f107010a96 completed March 20, 2026, 1:05 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69bd86f8d81081909174027a4fe640f2 completed March 20, 2026, 5:42 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69bd8463a9c88190bd760378f3026180 completed March 20, 2026, 5:31 p.m.
Created at: March 20, 2026, 2:03 p.m.