Triple

T537828
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Thomas Malory E12364 entity
Predicate historicalExistence P16606 FINISHED
Object disputed details LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: disputed details | Statement: [Thomas Malory, historicalExistence, disputed details]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: historicalExistence
Context triple: [Thomas Malory, historicalExistence, disputed details]
  • A. hasHistoricalEntity
    Indicates a relationship where one entity includes, references, or is associated with another entity that existed or is defined in a past historical context.
  • B. historicalReference
    Indicates that one entity refers to, cites, or alludes to another entity from an earlier time or historical context.
  • C. historicallyConsidered
    Indicates that one entity has been regarded or classified in a particular way relative to another entity during a past historical period.
  • D. hasHistoricalOrigin
    Indicates that something originated, was first established, or came into existence during a specific historical period or context.
  • E. historicallyIn
    Indicates that one entity existed, occurred, or was situated within the historical context, period, or jurisdiction associated with another entity.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a4933208e88190891f5debab1b776d completed March 1, 2026, 7:27 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69a4985e51908190a34aa82ea9dbee1e completed March 1, 2026, 7:49 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69a494b51ff08190a39f4168fd9a7ddf completed March 1, 2026, 7:34 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69a49857e1148190aa782b82675cf0b5 completed March 1, 2026, 7:49 p.m.
Created at: March 1, 2026, 7:32 p.m.