Triple
T5368063
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Jarash Governorate |
E103176
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasHeritageSiteType |
P23168
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Roman provincial city ruins |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Roman provincial city ruins | Statement: [Jarash Governorate, hasHeritageSiteType, Roman provincial city ruins]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasHeritageSiteType Context triple: [Jarash Governorate, hasHeritageSiteType, Roman provincial city ruins]
-
A.
hasCulturalSiteType
Indicates that an entity is associated with, or classified by, a specific type or category of cultural site.
-
B.
hasHeritageValueFor
Indicates that something possesses cultural, historical, or heritage significance for a particular entity or community.
-
C.
hasHeritageFeature
Indicates that an entity possesses or includes a feature recognized as part of cultural, historical, or natural heritage.
-
D.
hasArchaeologicalSiteType
chosen
Indicates that an entity is classified as, or associated with, a specific type or category of archaeological site.
-
E.
heritageType
Indicates the classification of an entity’s cultural or natural heritage category or type within a heritage framework.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69bd43daa3e4819090b59d127db70e57 |
completed | March 20, 2026, 12:55 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69bd86856f688190a34ab93619bae134 |
completed | March 20, 2026, 5:40 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69bd845f41f88190b75b8b64b9e41862 |
completed | March 20, 2026, 5:31 p.m. |
Created at: March 20, 2026, 2:02 p.m.