Triple

T5364010
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Scylla E103086 entity
Predicate hasVariantTraditions P46023 FINISHED
Object parentage LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: parentage | Statement: [Scylla, hasVariantTraditions, parentage]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasVariantTraditions
Context triple: [Scylla, hasVariantTraditions, parentage]
  • A. variantTraditions chosen
    Indicates that there exist differing or alternative traditions or customary practices associated with the same subject or context.
  • B. hasAlternativeParentTraditions
    Indicates that an entity is associated with additional, non-primary parent traditions beyond its main lineage or origin.
  • C. hasChildInSomeTraditions
    Indicates that, in at least some cultural, religious, or historical traditions, one entity is regarded as the child or offspring of another.
  • D. hasSourceTradition
    Indicates that something originates from, or is derived within, a particular cultural, religious, intellectual, or historical tradition.
  • E. hasVariantReadingsWith
    Indicates a relationship where two textual items are linked because they exhibit differing or alternative readings of (typically) the same underlying content.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69bd43daa3e4819090b59d127db70e57 completed March 20, 2026, 12:55 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69bd865d42508190a1a96121674c1020 completed March 20, 2026, 5:39 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69bd845f41f88190b75b8b64b9e41862 completed March 20, 2026, 5:31 p.m.
Created at: March 20, 2026, 2:02 p.m.