Triple

T5363436
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Nunki E103073 entity
Predicate hasUminusBColorIndex P63031 FINISHED
Object ~−0.88 LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: ~−0.88 | Statement: [Nunki, hasUminusBColorIndex, ~−0.88]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasUminusBColorIndex
Context triple: [Nunki, hasUminusBColorIndex, ~−0.88]
  • A. hasComplementaryColor
    Indicates that one color is the complementary (i.e., opposite on the color wheel, providing maximum contrast) counterpart of another color.
  • B. colorIndexB−V
    Indicates the difference between an object's blue (B) and visual (V) magnitudes, representing its color and thus its temperature or spectral characteristics.
  • C. hasColorSymbol
    Indicates that one entity is associated with another entity that serves as its representative or symbolic color.
  • D. hasColorExcess
    Indicates that an entity exhibits a measured amount of color excess, typically representing the difference between its observed color and its intrinsic or expected color.
  • E. hasColorRange
    Indicates that an entity possesses or is associated with a specific span or set of colors, rather than a single discrete color.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69bd43daa3e4819090b59d127db70e57 completed March 20, 2026, 12:55 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69bd865b9b808190a1e8c283ba28d645 completed March 20, 2026, 5:39 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69bd845f41f88190b75b8b64b9e41862 completed March 20, 2026, 5:31 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69bd85731dcc8190b4c1fe155967ab81 completed March 20, 2026, 5:35 p.m.
Created at: March 20, 2026, 2:02 p.m.