Triple
T5362789
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | ISO/IEC 27000 family |
E103059
|
entity |
| Predicate | definesConceptsIn |
P201
|
FINISHED |
| Object | information security management systems |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: information security management systems | Statement: [ISO/IEC 27000 family, definesConceptsIn, information security management systems]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: definesConceptsIn Context triple: [ISO/IEC 27000 family, definesConceptsIn, information security management systems]
-
A.
introducedConcept
chosen
Indicates that one entity is responsible for presenting, defining, or bringing a new concept into use or awareness for another entity or context.
-
B.
defendsConcept
Indicates that one entity actively supports and argues in favor of a particular concept, idea, or theory, often in response to criticism or challenge.
-
C.
hasConcept
Indicates that an entity includes, embodies, or is associated with a particular concept.
-
D.
definesAimsOf
Indicates that one entity specifies or establishes the goals, purposes, or intended outcomes of another entity.
-
E.
operationalConcept
Indicates that one entity defines, specifies, or embodies the operational concept or way of functioning for another entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69bd43daa3e4819090b59d127db70e57 |
completed | March 20, 2026, 12:55 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69bd865b9b808190a1e8c283ba28d645 |
completed | March 20, 2026, 5:39 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69bd845f41f88190b75b8b64b9e41862 |
completed | March 20, 2026, 5:31 p.m. |
Created at: March 20, 2026, 2:02 p.m.