Triple
T5361725
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Third Baldwin government |
E103035
|
entity |
| Predicate | defencePolicyContext |
P11690
|
FINISHED |
| Object | rearmament debate |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: rearmament debate | Statement: [Third Baldwin government, defencePolicyContext, rearmament debate]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: defencePolicyContext Context triple: [Third Baldwin government, defencePolicyContext, rearmament debate]
-
A.
defenceContext
Indicates the situational, legal, or strategic circumstances under which a defence action or defence-related relationship occurs.
-
B.
policyContext
chosen
Indicates the situational or regulatory framework within which a policy is defined, interpreted, or applied.
-
C.
defends
Indicates that one entity protects or supports another entity against attack, criticism, or harm.
-
D.
defenceHandledBy
Indicates that responsibility for managing or conducting a defence is assigned to or carried out by a particular agent or entity.
-
E.
foreignPolicyContext
Indicates the broader international relations setting or circumstances within which a foreign policy decision, action, or stance occurs.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69bd43daa3e4819090b59d127db70e57 |
completed | March 20, 2026, 12:55 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69bd865a0bb081909579cfe7c7974075 |
completed | March 20, 2026, 5:39 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69bd845f41f88190b75b8b64b9e41862 |
completed | March 20, 2026, 5:31 p.m. |
Created at: March 20, 2026, 2:02 p.m.