Triple

T5361681
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject United Kingdom general election, 1929 E103034 entity
Predicate LabourPopularVote P63021 FINISHED
Object 8,389,512 LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: 8,389,512 | Statement: [United Kingdom general election, 1929, LabourPopularVote, 8,389,512]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: LabourPopularVote
Context triple: [United Kingdom general election, 1929, LabourPopularVote, 8,389,512]
  • A. labourPopularVoteShare
    Indicates the proportion of all valid votes cast that were received by the Labour Party in a given election or electoral contest.
  • B. popularVoteShare
    Indicates the proportion of all votes cast in an election that were received by a particular candidate, party, or option.
  • C. AlliancePopularVoteShare
    Indicates the proportion of total votes received by a political alliance in an election relative to all valid votes cast.
  • D. popularVoteOutcome
    Indicates the result of a popular vote, specifying which option or candidate received the majority or winning share of votes.
  • E. smithPopularVote
    Indicates that Smith received a specified number or share of votes in a popular vote election or ballot.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69bd43daa3e4819090b59d127db70e57 completed March 20, 2026, 12:55 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69bd865a0bb081909579cfe7c7974075 completed March 20, 2026, 5:39 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69bd845f41f88190b75b8b64b9e41862 completed March 20, 2026, 5:31 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69bd85731dcc8190b4c1fe155967ab81 completed March 20, 2026, 5:35 p.m.
Created at: March 20, 2026, 2:02 p.m.