Triple
T5355228
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Dickinson County, Iowa |
E102672
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasTown |
P847
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Superior, Iowa |
E514494
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Superior, Iowa | Statement: [Dickinson County, Iowa, hasTown, Superior, Iowa]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Superior, Iowa Context triple: [Dickinson County, Iowa, hasTown, Superior, Iowa]
-
A.
Superior, Iowa
chosen
Superior, Iowa is a small rural city located in northwestern Iowa within Dickinson County, near the Iowa–Minnesota border.
-
B.
Jesup, Iowa
Jesup, Iowa is a small rural city in northeastern Iowa known for its close-knit community and location spanning Black Hawk and Buchanan counties.
-
C.
Hudson, Iowa
Hudson, Iowa is a small city in northeastern Iowa that functions as a suburban community within the Waterloo–Cedar Falls metropolitan area.
-
D.
Sibley, Iowa
Sibley, Iowa is a small city in northwestern Iowa that serves as the administrative and commercial hub of Osceola County.
-
E.
Farragut, Iowa
Farragut, Iowa is a small city in Fremont County named in honor of U.S. Civil War Admiral David Farragut.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69bd43d8f7248190b64c140734b5c9a8 |
completed | March 20, 2026, 12:55 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69bd862dbb008190aef653acddafd38b |
completed | March 20, 2026, 5:38 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69bf29193b6c8190bbf0854b4a766009 |
completed | March 21, 2026, 11:26 p.m. |
Created at: March 20, 2026, 2:01 p.m.