Triple
T5355196
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Dickinson County, Iowa |
E102672
|
entity |
| Predicate | contains |
P35
|
FINISHED |
| Object |
Superior, Iowa
Superior, Iowa is a small rural city located in northwestern Iowa within Dickinson County, near the Iowa–Minnesota border.
|
E514494
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (4 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Superior, Iowa | Statement: [Dickinson County, Iowa, contains, Superior, Iowa]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Superior, Iowa Context triple: [Dickinson County, Iowa, contains, Superior, Iowa]
-
A.
Jesup, Iowa
Jesup, Iowa is a small rural city in northeastern Iowa known for its close-knit community and location spanning Black Hawk and Buchanan counties.
-
B.
Hudson, Iowa
Hudson, Iowa is a small city in northeastern Iowa that functions as a suburban community within the Waterloo–Cedar Falls metropolitan area.
-
C.
Sibley, Iowa
Sibley, Iowa is a small city in northwestern Iowa that serves as the administrative and commercial hub of Osceola County.
-
D.
Farragut, Iowa
Farragut, Iowa is a small city in Fremont County named in honor of U.S. Civil War Admiral David Farragut.
-
E.
Kalona, Iowa
Kalona, Iowa is a small city in southeastern Iowa known for its large Amish and Mennonite communities and rich agricultural heritage.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NEDg
Description generation
gpt-5.1
Instruction
Generate a one-sentence description of the target entity. You are given a context triple in the form (subject, predicate, object), where the object is the target entity. # Instructions Use the triple to infer relevant information about the entity. Describe the entity based on what is most defining, well-known. Avoid repeating the information from the triple, unless really essential. # Response Format Return only the sentence: "Description: [one-sentence description of the target entity]"
Input
Entity: Superior, Iowa Triple: [Dickinson County, Iowa, contains, Superior, Iowa]
Generated description
Superior, Iowa is a small rural city located in northwestern Iowa within Dickinson County, near the Iowa–Minnesota border.
NED2
Entity disambiguation (via description)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Superior, Iowa Target entity description: Superior, Iowa is a small rural city located in northwestern Iowa within Dickinson County, near the Iowa–Minnesota border.
-
A.
Jesup, Iowa
Jesup, Iowa is a small rural city in northeastern Iowa known for its close-knit community and location spanning Black Hawk and Buchanan counties.
-
B.
Hudson, Iowa
Hudson, Iowa is a small city in northeastern Iowa that functions as a suburban community within the Waterloo–Cedar Falls metropolitan area.
-
C.
Sibley, Iowa
Sibley, Iowa is a small city in northwestern Iowa that serves as the administrative and commercial hub of Osceola County.
-
D.
Farragut, Iowa
Farragut, Iowa is a small city in Fremont County named in honor of U.S. Civil War Admiral David Farragut.
-
E.
Kalona, Iowa
Kalona, Iowa is a small city in southeastern Iowa known for its large Amish and Mennonite communities and rich agricultural heritage.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (5 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69bd43d8f7248190b64c140734b5c9a8 |
completed | March 20, 2026, 12:55 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69bd862dbb008190aef653acddafd38b |
completed | March 20, 2026, 5:38 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69bf21df856c819099cf9047b87d6db8 |
completed | March 21, 2026, 10:55 p.m. |
| NEDg | Description generation | batch_69bf22a6e3c081908a18bd370f924d39 |
completed | March 21, 2026, 10:58 p.m. |
| NED2 | Entity disambiguation (via description) | batch_69bf22fb8db48190b7ce94e5df8ed37f |
completed | March 21, 2026, 11 p.m. |
Created at: March 20, 2026, 2:01 p.m.