Triple

T5338565
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Lake Copais E123885 entity
Predicate drainageResult P63074 FINISHED
Object creation of fertile plain LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: creation of fertile plain | Statement: [Lake Copais, drainageResult, creation of fertile plain]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: drainageResult
Context triple: [Lake Copais, drainageResult, creation of fertile plain]
  • A. drainageStatus
    Indicates the condition or effectiveness of water removal or runoff from an area, surface, or system.
  • B. drainageType
    Indicates the kind or classification of drainage associated with or applied to an entity (e.g., how water is removed or flows from it).
  • C. causeOfDrainage
    Indicates the factor or process that leads to or is responsible for the drainage of a substance, area, or system.
  • D. drainageRole
    Indicates the functional role an entity plays in a drainage system, such as directing, collecting, or removing water or other fluids.
  • E. drainageDivideOf
    Indicates that one geographic feature functions as the drainage divide (separating water flow into different basins) for another feature or area.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69bd464b07f8819095aa76577c9829e4 completed March 20, 2026, 1:06 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69bd85e86edc81908d87933db6489f91 completed March 20, 2026, 5:37 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69bd845a62b081909782863865b257a9 completed March 20, 2026, 5:31 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69bd85e69e808190b29548670fd2900a completed March 20, 2026, 5:37 p.m.
Created at: March 20, 2026, 2 p.m.