Triple

T5328187
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Speak My Piece E123235 entity
Predicate albumCriticalReception P2378 FINISHED
Object generally positive reviews LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: generally positive reviews | Statement: [Speak My Piece, albumCriticalReception, generally positive reviews]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: albumCriticalReception
Context triple: [Speak My Piece, albumCriticalReception, generally positive reviews]
  • A. criticalReception chosen
    Indicates how a work, performance, or product is evaluated and responded to by critics or professional reviewers.
  • B. criticOutputs
    Indicates that a critic produces or provides an evaluative response, judgment, or commentary about a target.
  • C. metacriticCategory
    Indicates that one entity is classified under a specific Metacritic-defined category (such as a media type, genre, or section) in the Metacritic system.
  • D. alsoCalledByCritics
    Indicates that critics refer to the same entity by an alternative name or label.
  • E. authorOfCriticalReception
    Indicates that an entity is the author or creator of a critical review, evaluation, or reception of another work or subject.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69bd46477f9081909d242a327d749466 completed March 20, 2026, 1:06 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69bd8593bd6c8190b2054e548ddf2458 completed March 20, 2026, 5:36 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69bd84583dbc819088a03e3afb30178c completed March 20, 2026, 5:31 p.m.
Created at: March 20, 2026, 2 p.m.