Triple
T5323792
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Arvo Pärt |
E121737
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasCompositionalTechnique |
P14965
|
FINISHED |
| Object | tintinnabuli |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: tintinnabuli | Statement: [Arvo Pärt, hasCompositionalTechnique, tintinnabuli]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasCompositionalTechnique Context triple: [Arvo Pärt, hasCompositionalTechnique, tintinnabuli]
-
A.
hasTechnique
Indicates that an entity employs, utilizes, or is associated with a particular method, procedure, or technique.
-
B.
usedByTechnique
Indicates that a particular technique makes use of or employs the referenced entity as part of its method or process.
-
C.
compositionalFeature
Indicates that one entity is a structural or constituent feature that forms part of the composition or makeup of another entity.
-
D.
compositionalApproach
Indicates an approach where something is constructed, analyzed, or understood as a combination of smaller constituent parts and their arrangement.
-
E.
artisticTechnique
chosen
Indicates the method, style, or process used to create or execute an artistic work.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69bd463d956c819088105c3db802c017 |
completed | March 20, 2026, 1:06 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69bd86f20f008190be7b5848af05f2b8 |
completed | March 20, 2026, 5:42 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69bd84561c7081909e5937c7816e492c |
completed | March 20, 2026, 5:31 p.m. |
Created at: March 20, 2026, 1:59 p.m.