Triple
T5314068
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Uruguay national football team |
E119101
|
entity |
| Predicate | fifaWorldRankingPeakPosition |
P63434
|
FINISHED |
| Object | 2 |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: 2 | Statement: [Uruguay national football team, fifaWorldRankingPeakPosition, 2]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: fifaWorldRankingPeakPosition Context triple: [Uruguay national football team, fifaWorldRankingPeakPosition, 2]
-
A.
fifaRankingHighest
Indicates that the subject has the highest FIFA ranking among a specified group or within a given context.
-
B.
fifaRankingHighestDate
Indicates the date on which an entity achieved its highest-ever FIFA ranking.
-
C.
usedInFIFAWorldRankingLists
Indicates that something (typically a system, method, or data) is employed as part of the process for creating or determining the official FIFA World Ranking lists.
-
D.
FIFARankingWorst
Indicates that the subject has the lowest (worst) FIFA ranking among a specified set of entities.
-
E.
fifaLikeRankingType
Indicates a ranking system or classification that follows the style, rules, or methodology of FIFA’s official rankings.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69bd446b57bc8190a513d2e6c40314f3 |
completed | March 20, 2026, 12:58 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69bd86f20f008190be7b5848af05f2b8 |
completed | March 20, 2026, 5:42 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69bd84534f9c8190bc19d4812060768d |
completed | March 20, 2026, 5:30 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69bd86f0cbfc8190b6665dd9b28d6345 |
completed | March 20, 2026, 5:42 p.m. |
Created at: March 20, 2026, 1:54 p.m.