Triple
T5307882
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Executive Officer |
E120147
|
entity |
| Predicate | mayAssumeCommandWhen |
P63404
|
FINISHED |
| Object | commanding officer is absent |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: commanding officer is absent | Statement: [Executive Officer, mayAssumeCommandWhen, commanding officer is absent]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: mayAssumeCommandWhen Context triple: [Executive Officer, mayAssumeCommandWhen, commanding officer is absent]
-
A.
commandedBy
Indicates that one entity holds authoritative control or issues orders over another entity.
-
B.
mayActThrough
Indicates that an entity can exert influence, perform an action, or have an effect by means of another entity, mechanism, or intermediary.
-
C.
commandedFor
Indicates that one entity issued an order or directive on behalf of, or in service of, another entity or purpose.
-
D.
commandedTo
Indicates that one entity has issued an order or directive for another entity to perform a specific action or fulfill a particular duty.
-
E.
hasCommand
Indicates that one entity possesses, controls, or is associated with a specific command or directive applied to another entity or process.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69bd44704be88190acdb2ac481b0ff55 |
completed | March 20, 2026, 12:58 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69bd86f20f008190be7b5848af05f2b8 |
completed | March 20, 2026, 5:42 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69bd84534f9c8190bc19d4812060768d |
completed | March 20, 2026, 5:30 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69bd86f0cbfc8190b6665dd9b28d6345 |
completed | March 20, 2026, 5:42 p.m. |
Created at: March 20, 2026, 1:53 p.m.