Triple

T5307872
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Executive Officer E120147 entity
Predicate isSecondInCommandTo P31581 FINISHED
Object Commanding Officer LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Commanding Officer | Statement: [Executive Officer, isSecondInCommandTo, Commanding Officer]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: isSecondInCommandTo
Context triple: [Executive Officer, isSecondInCommandTo, Commanding Officer]
  • A. commanderAlsoServesAs
    Indicates that the person who holds a commander role simultaneously fulfills one or more additional official roles or positions.
  • B. isCommandedIn
    Indicates that an entity is under the authority or control of another entity within a specific context, such as a mission, operation, or organizational structure.
  • C. secondLeader chosen
    Indicates that an entity serves as the second-ranking leader or deputy leader in relation to another entity.
  • D. notCommanderOf
    Indicates that a given entity does not hold a commanding or leadership role over another specified entity.
  • E. hasCommanderRank
    Indicates that an entity holds the military or organizational rank of commander within a specified hierarchy or context.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69bd44704be88190acdb2ac481b0ff55 completed March 20, 2026, 12:58 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69bd86f20f008190be7b5848af05f2b8 completed March 20, 2026, 5:42 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69bd84534f9c8190bc19d4812060768d completed March 20, 2026, 5:30 p.m.
Created at: March 20, 2026, 1:53 p.m.