Triple
T5295747
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | dissenting opinion in Miranda v. Arizona |
E119849
|
entity |
| Predicate | opposesHolding |
P437
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Miranda warnings requirement |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Miranda warnings requirement | Statement: [dissenting opinion in Miranda v. Arizona, opposesHolding, Miranda warnings requirement]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: opposesHolding Context triple: [dissenting opinion in Miranda v. Arizona, opposesHolding, Miranda warnings requirement]
-
A.
opposedBy
chosen
Indicates that one entity actively resists, disagrees with, or works against the actions, views, or position of another entity.
-
B.
advocatesAgainst
Indicates that one entity actively opposes, argues against, or campaigns to prevent or stop another entity, action, or idea.
-
C.
opposedByLeader
Indicates that an action, proposal, or position is actively resisted or rejected by a leader.
-
D.
officeHoldersMustNot
Indicates that certain individuals are prohibited from holding specified offices or positions.
-
E.
holdsIn
Indicates that a relationship, condition, or event is valid or occurs within a specified time interval or temporal context.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69bd446f22b88190b6a47fb91c68a3e7 |
completed | March 20, 2026, 12:58 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69bd8682d18c8190bbb35cc75c8a7c12 |
completed | March 20, 2026, 5:40 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69bd844dfdac819086efedd1cbebff84 |
completed | March 20, 2026, 5:30 p.m. |
Created at: March 20, 2026, 1:52 p.m.