Triple

T5295732
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject majority opinion in Bowers v. Hardwick E119848 entity
Predicate subsequentTreatment P61771 FINISHED
Object criticized in later Supreme Court opinions including Lawrence v. Texas E119848 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: criticized in later Supreme Court opinions including Lawrence v. Texas | Statement: [majority opinion in Bowers v. Hardwick, subsequentTreatment, criticized in later Supreme Court opinions including Lawrence v. Texas]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07 
Target entity: criticized in later Supreme Court opinions including Lawrence v. Texas
Context triple: [majority opinion in Bowers v. Hardwick, subsequentTreatment, criticized in later Supreme Court opinions including Lawrence v. Texas]
  • A. majority opinion in Bowers v. Hardwick chosen
    The majority opinion in Bowers v. Hardwick is the 1986 U.S. Supreme Court decision, authored by Justice Byron White, that upheld the constitutionality of a Georgia law criminalizing consensual homosexual sodomy, later overturned by Lawrence v. Texas.
  • B. Lawrence v. Texas (in part)
    Lawrence v. Texas (in part) is a landmark 2003 U.S. Supreme Court decision that struck down laws criminalizing consensual same-sex intimacy, expanding constitutional protections for LGBTQ+ individuals.
  • C. Opinion in Cooley v. Board of Wardens (1852)
    The Opinion in Cooley v. Board of Wardens (1852) is a landmark U.S. Supreme Court decision that helped define the scope of the Commerce Clause by allowing certain local regulations affecting interstate commerce when they address inherently local matters.
  • D. opinion in Texas v. Johnson
    The opinion in Texas v. Johnson is the landmark U.S. Supreme Court decision that held flag burning is protected speech under the First Amendment.
  • E. opinion in Atkins v. Virginia
    The opinion in Atkins v. Virginia is a landmark 2002 U.S. Supreme Court decision, authored by Justice John Paul Stevens, that held executing individuals with intellectual disabilities violates the Eighth Amendment’s prohibition on cruel and unusual punishment.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69bd446f22b88190b6a47fb91c68a3e7 completed March 20, 2026, 12:58 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69bd84f19d048190a826f51acc603544 completed March 20, 2026, 5:33 p.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69bf06f8ebe08190b22a1d6733b80d07 completed March 21, 2026, 9 p.m.
Created at: March 20, 2026, 1:52 p.m.